Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Jackson (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to California Dreams. T. Canens (talk) 14:25, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Aaron Jackson (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: as non-notable former tween actor. Quis separabit? 07:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:NACTOR. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 08:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 22:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 22:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Notability not found, secondly this article lack independent Reliable sources Samat lib (talk) 21:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Article cites no sources to establish notability. Google and NYT searches provides "no results"  CBS 527 Talk 03:41, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to California Dreams as was done with both Michael Cade and William James Jones in earlier AfD's. I Notability tagged this one myself back in February 2016 (which removed when AfD'ing this one back in late December), but the fact is that Jackson is only known for his role on California Dreams, and thus fails WP:NACTOR, let alone WP:GNG. He is definitely not notable enough for a dedicated article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.