Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Montz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. There has always been some controversy over where to draw the line on notability for local politicians such as mayors of small cities, and whether the Toledo Blade is "too local" or not is an issue where reasonable people can disagree. In this discussion, we see that disagreement and since there is no consensus I am closing this one accordingly. Sjakkalle (Check!)  20:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Aaron Montz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

May not meet WP:POLITICIAN #2 ("major local political figures who have received significant press coverage"). &mdash; rybec   05:20, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * keep Now don't jump on me but i think that "Toledo Blade" might be able to prove nobility under WP:GNG.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 13:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jeffrd10. Sufficient coverage from reliable sources independent of subject.  Passes WP:GNG.   Levdr1 lp  /  talk  18:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Being the mayor of Tiflin does not make one notable. He has not received coverage beyond what is routine for all politicians in local papers. Tiflin is within the Toledo coverage area. If you could find mention in Detroit or Chicago or even Cleveland papers maybe, but not a Toledo paper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.