Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Stipkovich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I think consensus is clear enough that there is insufficient evidence for notability  DGG ( talk ) 01:21, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Aaron Stipkovich

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

A publisher, I think. Born in 1963, he has a reference in the article to him being a Chiropractor that was board certified in 1965. He has a IMDb reference] that he was a sound effects editor in TV shows and Video games from 1992-2001. I'm unable to find any reliable and independent refs about him. Bgwhite (talk) 07:59, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Bgwhite, The creator did not state that Aaron Stipkovich is a Chiropractor. It states that his father is, which is verifiable on the California State licensing site. Just wanted to let you know. I will try to add this to the page. (New at this.) Maxinetheone (talk) 17:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * delete No coverage in reliable sources. There is an Aaron Stipkovich mentioned in this article, but it is not clear if this is the same person.  This interview has the interviewee mentioning him.  That's all I could find. -- Whpq (talk) 16:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: The creator of this article has consistently referred to, uh, themself as "we". I wonder why. -- Hoary (talk) 02:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have added all the verifiable, governmental references and proof I could find. Every word on the creators page is verifiable. Is this all I do. Can I do this on anyone's page? Thanks! Maxinetheone (talk) 18:29, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Hi Whpq, yes that's the same Aaron Stipkovich. The connection to Buzzine and The Elfman's is valid and verifiable. Thank you.Maxinetheone (talk) 18:32, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Reply - The primary concern here whether Aaron Stipkovich meets Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines, more often simply called "notability". This is normally established with significant coverage in independent reliable sources such as magazines and newspapers.  The references in the article satisfy requirements of verifiability but do not establish that inclusion guidelines are met. I hope this helps clarify the main concern in this discussion. -- Whpq (talk) 19:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Question: Is there any independent evidence for a claim that he's a photographer of note? -- Hoary (talk) 23:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: next to no independent write-ups. Let's try linking what the article now tells us. He's "become involved in numerous media endeavors including Buzzine, AND Magazine, and the intelligence community think tank, Think.us.com." All red. Try again: AND magazine, And magazine, AND (magazine), And (magazine), Think.us. Still all red. Just one of these is linked, to this, which tells us that As a member of Think since 1999, and with the subject of politics being substantive to Aaron, he decided to launch one publication that would be of interest to the mass of like-thinkers who travail, burdened with a painful void of culture and politics that plagues their every waking moment. / The publication that launched, laden beneath the weight of gnarl, was AND Magazine. (I hadn't previously encountered the notion of a subject being "substantive" to anybody; perhaps I am undereducated.) The result seems to be a celeb website, but whether or not it happens to be of interest to you or me, it seems to have made little or no impact on publications indexed at Google News. -- Hoary (talk) 09:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.