Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron hoare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete as attack page. Tyrenius 17:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Aaron hoare
Originally tagged CSD-G1 patent nonsense. But it isn't patent. It is nonsensical in places, unsourced and unreferenced and completely unwikified, but there's no speedy criterion for that :o) so it comes here. No opinion from me - I'm just clearing CAT:CSD. ➨  ЯEDVERS  10:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, completely made up. NawlinWiki 12:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete as patent nonsense. Article claims accomplishments done 20 years before the subject was born. It is nonsense. It must go. --DarkAudit 13:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced. --Craig Stuntz 13:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Very strong delete, alone the many impossible dates in the article gives it away as nonsense on purpose Optimale  Gu 14:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Has anyone considered Speedy Delete as attack page? How would you feel if you found this text under your name? Fan-1967 14:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Tagged as attack These articles give Wikipedia a bad name. How can garbage like this not be a CSD? And why would it be allowed another five days of life (unless of course WP:SNOW kicks in first)? --DarkAudit 16:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as complete and utter nonsense. Shadow1 16:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.