Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron vidler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen&times; &#9742;  23:31, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Aaron vidler
Unverifiable. Nothing can be found about this guy, or the alleged "National Vidler Museum" or the town called Vilder in Australia. Seems like a hoax or a joke. The original author has been warned for vandalism. May be a sockpuppet of User: 211.27.173.12, who wrote Alberto Karanfilov which is a similar unverifiable Australia article created last week as well. --W.marsh 19:02, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think there's some sort of systematic Aaron Vidler-related vandalism campaign going on. IP addresses 60.228.209.112 and 202.94.67.44 added him to Shaquille O'Neal on November 16. -- howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 22:09, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Durova 23:17, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. 9 unique Google hits for "Aaron Vidler" None except Wikipedia refer to him as an Australian explorer - certainly, as an Australian Id never heard of him. Few Australian explorers or anyone else used muskets in the late 19th century either. Capitalistroadster 23:46, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  .Capitalistroadster 00:07, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ze miguel 08:30, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Sarah Ewart 02:55, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Longhair 08:38, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Longhair 08:38, 24 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom --Roisterer 07:48, 25 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.