Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaval


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 21:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Aaval



 * I've searched the entire net for hours and I have not come across ANY article that provides mention of this film. Also note that all these articles provide the same trivia as Hello Zindagi, Yaaravan Nalam and Ivan Yaaro, that is that these so called "films" are being shot at a budget of Rs. 30 million and these articles have been created on the same day. These articles have also been created in a mere gap of 13 minutes by the same person, which is bound to raise suspicion. I suspect the article has been purposely created - pure fancruft. Therefore, I propose this article be deleted because Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. It also fails WP:V. -- Visual planet 12:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. MER-C 12:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, non-verifiable. johnpseudo 16:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete > Don't know whether that is அவல், அவள் or ஆவல்   Doctor Bruno    16:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Definite Keep : I have enclosed information by a letter from Madhavan about his projects. This is a e-mail I received from Mr Madhavan himself, a friend of mine. He has confirmed these films. Proof is here. Prince Godfather 16:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Definite Delete : I'm sorry if I'm being rude but this is utter nonsense. Obviously User:Prince Godfather mistakes us for fools. Firstly, that could have been User:Prince Godfather faking as the actor himself, heck, it could have been anyone. And how in the world would you expect me to believe that the letter that you have brought up has been written by Madhavan himself? The so called proof User:Prince Godfather has provided links to a FANSITE. Don't you think Madhavan has better work to do than to come to Wikipedia and watch us nominating his articles for deletion and then logging on to that fanclub site and emailing User:Prince Godfather with a letter confirming these films?. And why would "he" even provide us with his email address? So that his fans can mob him with fan mails? Sorry, but i'm definitely not buying it! Please provide a more believablebetter reason. You can bring this issue to anyone on Wikipedia and I am sure they would think the same. -- Visual planet 18:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  The email still doesn't negate the fact that either the director of the film has no verification whatsoever. –-  kungming·  2 | (Talk ·Contact) 01:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - User:Prince Godfather believes us to be morons, obviously. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 18:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions.   -- Slgr @ ndson (page - messages - contribs) 03:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.   -- Slgr @ ndson (page - messages - contribs) 03:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Notability found here Prince Godfather 19:43, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I can see no mention of Aaval in this link. It only mentiones Hello Zindagi. Is this the correct link? GameKeeper 20:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Aaval is the Ram Gopal Varma film as I stressed before. The text is written by Madhavan in a e-mail to his fan club. Prince Godfather 20:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I can see no mention of Aaval in this link. It only mentiones Hello Zindagi. Is this the correct link? GameKeeper 20:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Aaval is the Ram Gopal Varma film as I stressed before. The text is written by Madhavan in a e-mail to his fan club. Prince Godfather 20:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete:Even if the film was mentioned in the link User:Prince Godfather provided, it clearly is untitled and all the information provided on the page would be false. Therefore, it should still be deleted and then re-created when more information surfaces. -- Visual planet 14:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Dwaipayan (talk) 10:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete-as per all. Nileena joseph (Talk 16:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.