Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ab Sadeghi-Nejad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  18:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Ab Sadeghi-Nejad

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

After the cruft was removed, it seems there's nothing that supports WP:NPROF. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators,  and Massachusetts. UtherSRG (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Medicine, California, Illinois,  and Wisconsin.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. No significant independent RS coverage that I could find. Only hits in WP:LIBRARY are his research papers and a quote in Men's Health about growth hormone therapy. His book is self-published and I couldn't find any reviews. That leaves us with WP:NPROF criteria. I think the research impact criterion is the only one that might apply, but I'm unfamiliar with the subject area so will leave that for others to evaluate. Jfire (talk) 14:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete., others, I do not see signs of significant academic impact here.  I see on Google Scholar several papers with a moderate number of citations, but in a medium-to-higher citation field.  (Even in a lower citation field, I'm generally looking for several papers with more citations than the highest cited one I see of his.)  Awards listed in the article are all WP:MILL, as is membership on an editorial board.  I was cursory in checking NAUTHOR and GNG, but did not quickly see a pass. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 18:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sadeghi-Nejad is one of the most notable experts in the field of pediatric endocrinology, globally, and his publications support that. A niche medical field does not have the same number of citations as more general research areas. In addition, the book Dreams of Persia is an important contribution to Persian-American culture and linguistic heritage. KatMaldon (talk) 15:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC) — KatMaldon (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Based on the discussion above and given his citation numbers, I'm not sure we're at notability. I don't find critical reviews of his books, so there wouldn't bee AUTHOR notability either. Oaktree b (talk) 15:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.