Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ababeel (NGO)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Clear consensus that the article passes GNG. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:08, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Ababeel (NGO)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Resources are not independent reliable. Self Published. Fails WP:ORG KST981 (talk) 09:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: the nominator has been blocked as a sock. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibaji/Archive -- Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 15:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I tried to clean it up a bit. But I agree that this organisation does not satisfy WP:GNG criteria. George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 10:38, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete — I am satisfied by 's argument. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 10:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: I change my vote to keep. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 15:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: WP:GNG is clearly satisfied by the following sources (with at least 1 paragraph about the NGO): The Indian Express, The Kashmir Monitor, Greater Kashmir, Two Circles, News18. Did the nominator or other editors here attempt a WP:BEFORE search? Notability isn’t based solely on references already in the article (although some of these were already in the article anyways). — MarkH21talk 15:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: This article is about organization, which I started is notable because many reliable sources like The Indian Express, The Kashmir Monitor, Greater Kashmir, Two Circles, News18 and many more sources available online are specially about the organization. So WP:GNG is clearly satisfied. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheChunky (talk • contribs) 19:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:GNG. Polyamorph (talk) 06:43, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep A notable organization with many reliable references. Ngrewal1 (talk) 01:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:GNG and WP:ORG. سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ(talk) 13:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.