Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abaca, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Abaca, Inc.
Obscure company which fails the google test, which outputs the wikipedia article as #2, along with a huge list of unrelated companies. Not notable, probably vanity --Mecanismo | Talk 23:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, article doesn't even assert why the company or its product is notable. NawlinWiki 23:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Valrith 00:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. While there is some assertion of notability (i.e. originating SLA's), I can't find any proof to back this up, nor any independent mention of the company. Leuko 03:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I don't think introduction of SLAs is particularly notable. They are standard best practice in many large companies. does not appear otherwise to meet WP:CORP Ohconfucius 04:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.