Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abadpour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was delete. – Avi 14:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Abadpour
There are no notable "Abadpours" listed, no sources to verify any of the information. This is a bunch of speculated fluff that serves no purpose. For as useful as this is, I might as well make a page about my pets.Gnrlotto 02:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

DeleteGnrlotto 02:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, it is a surname please see [].--John Lake 02:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It still remains non-notable.Gnrlotto
 * Seems more so than this one and a number of the other stubs.--John Lake 20:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * So because a bunch of people jump off a bridge, we should too? Poor reasoning.  I'll be nominating that one for deletion next.Gnrlotto 01:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Edit: Nomination for Gettleman complete.Gnrlotto 02:08, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Probably should be nominated, but what do you mean "So because a bunch of people jump off a bridge, we should too?", what does that have to do with either stub?--John Lake 16:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Your point in keeping this one was that, in your opinion, there are other pages of less notable content. That's the old high school excuse, "Mom, I only drunk at the party because my friends Dave and John were doing it too."  Just because some other people posted useless genealogy cruft pages doesn't mean we should let someone else's page stay.  Just delete 'em as we find 'em.  Otherwise you're using the "They jumped off a bridge, so I'm going to as well," excuse. That's poor reasoning for keeping a page. Gnrlotto 18:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. (Liberatore, 2006). 11:42, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep but verify. It looks similar to other name stubs. Main thing I see lacking is a notable person with that surname. --DarkAudit 14:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a directory of surnames all over the world. If it was turned into a hndis page then maybe. The article is also vanity for the creator, User:Abadpour. Punkmorten 16:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is non-notable and unverified, and per punkmorten, vanity. -- Kicking222 20:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom--Nick Y. 22:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.