Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abagail Grey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 19:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Abagail Grey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The best my searches found was this and this which all show Scottish news including this article and I was going to search more in-depth there but this seems obvious with no better improvement. It's worth noting "Abagail Grey" started this article in April 2012 so it's imaginable it was the band themselves. Pinging and. SwisterTwister  talk  22:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I'm gonna say week keep on this one cause it seems to meet the basic requirements for notability as it has been mentioned in more than one reliable source but I don't like that it appears to have been self made. Not So Dumb Blond (talk) 01:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:BASIC, and WP:GNG. The underlying, or basic, notability guidelines require that multiple secondary reliable sources exist to cover this band, and that the coverage is significant and to the point that no original research is needed to extract the content. The only two sources I could find that were secondary, reliable, and discussed the band somewhat-significantly as its main topic were this and this. These sources seem okay to me, but the overall problem with this band is that significant coverage doesn't seem to exist... not enough to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:BASIC or establish notability.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - no evidence of notability, Also I'm sorry but the name is rather stupid ... It looks like they tried to spell "Abigail" and ended up screwing it up entirely! ... Anyway fails GNG & all that. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per SwisterTwister. Searches didn't turn up enough to show they pass WP:GNG or WP:NBAND.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.