Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abandin Theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. SorryGuy Talk  23:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Abandin Theory

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability Manik52 (talk) 10:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  12:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * (That's a rather brief reason for nomination. Oh well.) The article states that the band has been featured in Now and in Eye Weekly but I could find no evidence of that, nor could I find any other third-party sources beyond club listings. If no third-party sources turn up, then I will have to say delete since the band does not seem to meet WP:MUSIC criteria otherwise. -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 00:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   — Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 02:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I'm not seeing much evidence of notability here either. They don't even have a profile on New Music Canada, for heaven's sake. Delete unless somebody can come up with some real sources. Bearcat (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete This band appears non notable at the present time. --Stormbay (talk) 22:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.