Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abantecart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Article contains no more evidence of notability than that deleted by Articles for deletion/AbanteCart (capital C in name). &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Abantecart

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable open source software failing WP:NOTABILITY. Recreation of the previously AfD deleted spam article AbanteCart, which also been speedily deleted a multitude of times. Has a few links but they seem to be press releases. Seems to be nothing more than Self-promotion and product placement, which wikipedia is WP:NOT. Hu12 (talk) 22:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:11, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination above and the rationale on the March 2012 AfD deletion. As before, only the PracticalEcommerce (p)review may provide a WP:RS. Aside from that I'm only seeing a couple of download site basic pages on the product. AllyD (talk) 07:34, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * This article is much the same as what I recall of that deleted by the March AfD. Is it sufficiently different for CSD:G4 not to apply this time around, as it did with a previous repost on 13th October (see User talk:Projkov)? AllyD (talk) 07:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note; User Projkov‏‎ is the bureaucrat, administrator on abantecart.com's wiki site; (abantecart.com/document_wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Projkov), and the administrator of the forums as evidenced below.--Hu12 (talk) 15:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Still review I am not sure if I can provide any input here. I have looked at prior delete in User talk:Projkov but I can not find prior article that was deleted. AllyD said that the article is much the same. How can prior deleted article be seen to be sure it is the same? Finally, I found this resource  that I seen was valued in some other similar article. I hope this helps and apologies, since I am new to wikipedia. — Eccommercewisdom (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 14:03, 28 October 2012‎ (UTC).
 * Fails as a WP:RS--Hu12 (talk) 15:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Note; It appears there is an ongoing effort to solicit for this articles creation, by AbanteCart
 * "AbanteCart needs help with wikipedia article"
 * "Dear AbanteCart contributors or users, We ask anyone who is familiar with wikipedia articles submission help AbanteCart project to be approved in wikipedia. After some time of struggle and internal discussion in Wikipedia our article was removed" on: March 28, 2012, 11:06:22 AM - abantecart, forum Administrator
 * "I attempted one more time yesterday. Spent 3 hours I tried to follow all the rules for submission and included 3 references and it was still deleted because of COI. Someone else needs to post it. If somebody has some reputation in wikipedia and can help us with posting, please let me know and I will send wikipedia atricle that I have built." - Reply #10 on: October 14, 2012, 02:55:46 PM - abantecart, forum Administrator
 * Several users have agreed to make attempts at promoting AbanteCart, and we have seen multiple WP:SPA / advertising-only account created for that purpose;--Hu12 (talk) 15:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Sources do not establish notablity. - MrOllie (talk) 17:43, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment; I already realized in the past of COI with my original article. I apologized for not knowing this, and am sorry for this again.  Calling me bureaucrat, spammer, advertiser (what else is there) is not nice.  After all we run free, open source, non profit development community. I have no connection to the accounts "puppets" mentioned here. Projkov (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.