Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbas Foroughi Bastami


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Abbas Foroughi Bastami

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prod declined because "there are sources", but extensive searching failed to find any. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The reason for declining WP:PROD deletion was nothing resembling that. I don't know whether the subject is notable, but I object strongly to such misrepresentation. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - added one source, also google hits asserts some notability Google Search Result. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 20:17, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No doubt the poet existed but is it a notable poet? I can't find much that would show. Even the sourcing at the Farsi and Arabic Wikipedia is poor. It's not like 19th century Iranian poetry is unknown to the English world, we do have English language sources and experts on it, Google Books comes up with very little to none scholarly notice. --Green Cardamom (talk) 06:52, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:16, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.