Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbas Sajwani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Abbas Sajwani

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Spam. The subject is only mentioned in the first line of the article, and then the article goes to talk about some company (notable or not) owned by the father of the subject. Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Arab Emirates. Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The subject is mentioned at the beginning and then the article goes to talk about a company he founded and still owns. It's not owned by his father. --Abdullah Arfa (talk) 18:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)


 * This is a weird one. I agree, the article is not about the person; the article is about his business. It should, if it is kept, be moved to the name of the business, and it should be assessed as a business, not as a person. My feeling is that it is blatantly promotional, and the articles used as references look like the sort of commissioned articles or regurgitated press-releases that are not independent of the subject, and therefore I would have sympathy with deletion. But I lack expertise on businesses. Elemimele (talk) 18:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete The person is only ever mentioned in press-releases. Nothing notable found. Agreed the article is odd. Oaktree b (talk) 01:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - This article is clearly promotional, and can be deleted. There is also a draft.  Robert McClenon (talk) 07:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly promotional fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.