Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbasi Brothers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:14, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Abbasi Brothers

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A generally non notable music group with a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources and also fails to pass WP:BAND. Mattg82 (talk) 15:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Coverage found from WIRED, Cokemachineglow.com .--Michig (talk) 19:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, based on 2700 ghits for "abbasi brothers -wikipedia". no news hits, though.  I would be opposed to any branch articles for songs or albums, though.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. per WP:BAND.  Sounds like music I'd probably like, but they don't appear to pass our guidelines at this time.  In response to the above, google hits are notoriously poor at guaging notability, and 2700 hits is hardly impressive anyway: I get about 10 times that for my own name. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * delete - Nothing to remedy the core concerns despite 2 extensions. Not enough to suggest notability. Shadowjams (talk) 10:56, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, no indication of meeting WP:N or WP:MUSIC. The sources found by Michig above are hardly sufficient to satisfy the GNG. Huon (talk) 16:58, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.