Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbottabad Jamia Public School (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Abbottabad Jamia Public School
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  06:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment- I can't comment on the quality of this other wiki but it does seem that this is the case of  notable school that we have failed to document so far. @ saying fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG is not very helpful- as we have no idea what your concern is, and are wasting a lot of time trying to imagine what it is before we can verify it for the discussion. The less worthy the article the longer it takes. ClemRutter (talk) 11:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * You're talking about Abbottabad Public School article, related to your other wiki. My concern is there is no WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS which is necessary to meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG. I hope you know this already that any private school should meet WP:NORG or WP:NCORP if they fails WP:GNG as per guidlines after 2017 RfC on school articles. Störm   (talk)  11:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Nahal (T) 09:20, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete In 2017 we abandoned the view that all secondary schools were notable, and there is no sign of notability here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.