Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdalhadi Alijla


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 19:07, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Abdalhadi Alijla

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This doctoral researcher fails both WP:SCHOLAR and WP:GNG. His publications appears to be primarily conference presentations and working papers as he is very early in his career. I was unable to find significant citations to his work. I was also unable to turn up any significant independent reliable source coverage for GNG. It appears to be a case of WP:TOOSOON. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:36, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Looks WP:TOOSOON indeed. No evidence of influence that can be independently verified. Fails all applicable WP:PROF categories.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF or any other notability criterion, and the sources do not pass muster. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.