Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdalhadi M. Al-Sopai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:14, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Abdalhadi M. Al-Sopai

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

One mentioning of the name in one primary source. Not enough to establish notability. IQinn (talk) 00:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC) IQinn (talk) 00:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guantanamo Bay detainment camp-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:54, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete this and several dozen identically poorly-sourced articles. See Category:People held at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp. THF (talk) 18:37, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Not ideal sourcing but what there is is reliable and acceptable. There is, in my opinion,  enough available material to permit articles on each individual who is known to have been held in gitmo .    DGG ( talk ) 07:03, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - This fails every basic rules we have to establish notability and for sourcing including WP:GNG. If you have a close look at the sources than you will notice that there is only one primary source that mention "the name" only one time. No further information whatsoever in this document or in any other documents. I know you are an knowledgeable long term user who should know that we do have basic requirements that need to be fulfilled. This here ridiculously fails our guidelines that i ask you either to name the "available material" here on this page or i think your !vote should be discounted. Any other source other than the one document that mention the name one time? That would surely not enough for any individual in the world to write an encyclopedic biography on a person no matter how low you want to put the standard. Somehow it looks like we are heading in direction of Articles for deletion/Unknown Tajiki captive in Guantanamo or Deletion_review/Log/2010_July_15 that were deleted for the same reason. If additional sources can be found - ok no problem but so far it breaks all basic quality standards and rules we have here at Wikipedia. IQinn (talk) 09:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I don't see any notability aside from his presence at Guantanamo. There is no benefit in having this article beyond what can be included at List of Guantanamo Bay detainees.  Gnome de plume (talk) 14:36, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.