Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdirizak Jurile


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 08:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Abdirizak Jurile

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable individual. Plus source doesn't mention that which is added in the Wikipedia article about him. He is not a known individual and the page deserves to be removed. Buraomagnificent (talk) 00:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 14:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject served in the Somalia parliament, passing WP:POLITICIAN. - --Enos733 (talk) 17:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Obvious keep. A person who not only served in a national parliament, as Enos733 mentions, but also served as a government minister for several years is "not a notable individual"? It is true that most of the statements in the article are not supported by the cited source, but the fact that he was a member of the upper house of the parliament is supported, and that is enough to establish notability. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk)
 * Keep - I had prodded this solely on the procedural grounds that it was a blp without a single source. Once sources were provided, the prod became moot and was rightly removed. As above editors have pointed out, this person definitely pass WP:POLITICIAN. Needs better sourcing and clean-up, but not removal.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Government ministers are default notable, even if the government is less than fully functional.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.