Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdoulahi measure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Abdoulahi measure

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not much out there that I can find on this. Two of the three citations are to the originator. The third is to a conference, at which the originator presented, and is likely intended to also be a reference to him. Overall, a recently invented term with no indication it has gotten outside recognition. Timothy Joseph Wood 18:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC) *Not delete Secondary sources found: Here are two publications from Google sponsored authors using the Abdoulahi measure. You can check it here: https://www.google.com/patents/US9424299 https://www.google.com/patents/US9424298 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bitsidibe (talk • contribs) 08:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)   — Bitsidibe (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Bitsidibe is a ✅ sockpuppet of. See Sockpuppet investigations/Abd boubacar. GABgab 00:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC) *not delete This article needs to be improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sidibe12 (talk • contribs) 08:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)  — Sidibe12 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Sidibe12 is a ✅ sockpuppet of. See Sockpuppet investigations/Abd boubacar. GABgab 00:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Can only find primary sources, all of which seem to have been written by the article's creator. No secondary sources means it fails WP:GNG. -- Shudde  talk 18:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I was unable to find any in-depth secondary reliable sources; it fails WP:GNG. Without secondary sourcing, is not a good candidate for a merge or a redirect. Hence, delete. --Mark viking (talk) 20:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Not remove Secondary sources exist but do not have high page rank. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abd boubacar (talk • contribs) 08:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC) — Abd boubacar (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete as a concept coined and used by one person with no indication that it has become widely accepted or used, and no secondary sources about the topic. The two (identical in every detail except some file numbers, so in reality it is just one) patent grants linked above don't actually mention the Abdoulahi measure anywhere. --bonadea contributions talk 09:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * here is the reference article cited by each of the two articles above and using the proposed measure. You need to read really the articles. otherwise go to the references section:<< A. Boubacar et al., Concept Based Information Retrieval, International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, Aug. 2013.>> It seems that it is not your topic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bitsidibe (talk • contribs) 15:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The research article is a primary source, and the patent application is, well, a patent application. Neither serves to show that the concept meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. This is not a peer review for a scientific journal - the process is rigorous in a different way, and there are different requirements that must be met. --bonadea contributions talk 20:58, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete clearly fails notability check, and those opposing the delete above appear to have a WP:COI HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 20:05, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I am the author of this article and I ask you to delete the article as soon as you can. Some people help me to make the article better. There is a problem with the name of the article which must be Semantic measure instead of "measure". The lack of secondary sources come from here. So delete it as soon as you can. You do not need to oppose other people views. Share your views. DELETE IT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abd boubacar (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy delete at author request, per above. Tagged accordingly. Tigraan Click here to contact me 16:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.