Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abduction of Rahma el-Dennaoui


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 00:10, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Abduction of Rahma el-Dennaoui

 * – ( View AfD View log )

clearly WP:NOTNEWS. children go missing all the time. all the cited sources are around the same date which just reinforces this article is just a summary of news coverage. LibStar (talk) 00:07, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep A little bit of WP:BEFORE would have shown that this is more than just an old news story.  and .  Given that the case is still being followed by the press five years later, it crossed the line from WP:NEWS to WP:EVENT awhile back. Mandsford 15:21, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I can understand this fact: the article is about one of the most debated crime case of Australia so keep. User:Lucifero4
 * Keep -- criminal justice cases that go on for years beyond the crime are generally kept. Bearian (talk) 19:38, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.