Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Alim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 00:59, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Abdul Alim

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Would need a complete rewrite to unbias it. It also reads like a magazine article. Vistro (talk) 21:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep none of the above reasons are valid to delete an article. Jenuk1985  |  Talk  21:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also probably more relevant in the Arabic Wikipedia.  --Sc straker (talk) 22:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment so you are voting for the same reasons given in the nomination, which are not valid reasons for deletion? See WP:DEL. "Delete per nom" can only be valid when the nomination itself is valid, in this case it is not. Jenuk1985  |  Talk  22:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Why on earth would an article about an Indian/Pakistani (I'm not sure if he lived long enough to become Bangladeshi) folk singer be any more or less relevant on the Arabic Wikipedia than on the English one? Phil Bridger (talk) 15:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Procedural Keep No valid reasons have been given for deletion. Edward321 (talk) 00:25, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - The nominator does not provide any rationale for deletion. POV is addressed throuogh editting and not deletion. Note that a quick perusal of the article history will show that a revert back to this version would deal with the problem. -- Whpq (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment, I have done that reversion, because the more recent version is a copyright violation of the cited source. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.