Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Aziz (Cricketer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 12:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Abdul Aziz (Cricketer)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject hasn't done anything notable. The only remotely notable thing about the subject is his death. StaticGull Talk  15:23, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

His death, whilst tragic, is part of cricketing legend, and needs to be recorded in an encyclopedia. Please don't delete it unless you have a firm understanding of the game and still think it unoteworthy. Otherwise, this would be unfair. Uncoolcroaker (talk) 15:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:ATHLETE covers this. Johnlp (talk) 16:11, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, he has played in a major competition that satisfies WP:Athlete, and satisfies the notability requirements (and precedence) set by WikiProject Cricket. It is a valid, referenced article, which could well be expanded. Uncoolcroaker (talk) 16:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Subject is notable per WP:Athlete and WP:CRIN, but article needs to be expanded to better establish his notability. Andrew nixon (talk) 16:27, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Needs serious cleanup, but he played in a well-known championship/event, which satisfies WP:ATHLETE. Calor (talk) 16:36, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep As above Bevo74 (talk) 23:18, 16 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.