Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Aziz (Taliban leader)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:52, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Abdul Aziz (Taliban leader)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:BIO. While his brother is notable, he is a secondary figure, who has received very little attention. No Google books hits, only one Google News Archive hit about him, very similar to the one listed in the article. A WP:BLP1E, a person noted once when arrested together with a more important person, but who failed to get significant attention before or since. Fram (talk) 15:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:21, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Notability is not inherited, subject fails WP:BIO per nom.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 17:25, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO as per nom.
 * A request -- I request a relisting, rather than closure, as the sheer volume of recent xfd has left me without enough time to respond to this one. Geo Swan (talk) 13:19, 20 December 2010 (UTC)`
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  —Anotherclown (talk) 11:46, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacks significant independent coverage in reliable sources and therefore fails the notability guidelines in WP:MILMOS/N. Anotherclown (talk) 11:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not meet the requirements of the WP:GNG. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.