Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Raheem Green


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The reasons for deletion seem to outweigh the reasons for retention here, which are weak at best. –MuZemike 00:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Abdul Raheem Green

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

nothing in the article points to specific notability Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 04:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per CSD A7. An article about a person that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. N / A  0  04:42, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Do not delete. Abdul Raheem Green is a notable and important person in the Muslim community. The article is useful and informative. Qwerta369 (talk) 08:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Probable Keep. The refs link above shows quite a few hits. I've searched myself too, and I found quite a few (although a lot are blogs and forums). Found only two GNews hits myself (, and ), both of which only seem to mention him in passing, but some general GHits look fairly strong, including, , (that one's a Mail article so don't know why it wasn't found in a GNews search). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:39, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7, not notable. Currently, he is working with an Islamic media company based in England and engages himself in da’wah activities including lectures on Islam in London’s famous Hyde Park. Is that notable? Hardly. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 12:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per A7 Nilotpal  42  13:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Week keep . (Neutral) Character seems to be reasonably prominent member of Islamic community. Has received quite a bit of coverage, even if not necessarily from the most mainstream (or reliable) of sources. Certainly far from being a candidate for speedy deletion. Suspect this is a response to his 'conversion'. Christopher Connor (talk) 03:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Extremely bad faith-keep your suspicions to yourself. A poor article is a poor article.--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 04:52, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - as per nom. Codf1977 (talk) 14:56, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.