Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Rahman Abu Baka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Incomplete longevity claims. Article history deleted. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 01:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Abdul Rahman Abu Baka

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not clear. According to legal sources, aged 105 when he died, and oldest person in Malaysia. Family claim he was 117 - unverified. By the verified sources, he is not the record-holder for Malaysia - Wook Kundor is currently 107 or 108. Whichever way, it seems he fails notability per WP:1E, although there is some coverage. Boleyn (talk) 07:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG with coverage. ☯ Bonkers The Clown  \(^_^)/  Nonsensical Babble  ☯ 08:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I added his name to Incomplete_longevity_claims. It should also be noted that the name is apparently a misspelling, the sources from the article show his name as Abdul Rahman Abu Bakar. --Revolución  talk  09:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * So, you haven't revealed your "Delete" rationale... ☯ Bonkers The Clown  \(^_^)/  Nonsensical Babble  ☯ 09:29, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete living to be 105 is not in and of itself notable. There are no other claims of notability.  At best this is one event, and one event is not enough to make an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Being old is not a claim to notability. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: Has anyone contemplated redirecting? ☯ Bonkers The Clown  \(^_^)/  Nonsensical Babble  ☯ 10:31, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment It's something always worth thinking over. What do you propose as a possible redirect target? Boleyn (talk) 12:32, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Incomplete_longevity_claims would be a good candidate. ☯ Bonkers The Clown  \(^_^)/  Nonsensical Babble  ☯ 12:35, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.