Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Rahman Shaikh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, discounting the sockpuppetry. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Abdul Rahman Shaikh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable sportsperson Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 11:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - The only sources that I could find for this person were in the context of various crimes committed in India, apparently by someone with the same or similar name. The subject fails WP:BASIC for lack of available sources.- MrX 11:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - The sources which were found by other users were not the right sources. When this article was submitted it had had no references due to which the article failed to meet WP criteria, now the article have right sources and references.  Tim Harris84 (talk) 23:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The nominator said this person was involved in various crimes in India and also the article had no references before, now the references has been added and all the sources are clear, and what the nominator pointed out was not correct. Tim Harris84 (talk) 10:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, those source do not appear to be reliable, especially for a WP:BLP.- MrX 11:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable 2601:84:4601:D750:D043:CB32:2469:3670 (talk) 20:53, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

*Keep - The page is new and needs time to grow, the sources has been added. Sindbadmasr (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as per MrX; the criminal is clearly a different Abdul Rahman Shaikh, so the absence of sources is not an encouraging sign for notability. Needless to say, the SPI is here, and I have taken the liberty to strike the vote of the CU-confirmed sock. GABHello! 19:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, though if anyone can provide evidence that there is indeed a "professional motorcycle" by this name I would be very interested. Guy (Help!) 09:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as simply none of this suggesting considerably better notability and necessary improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  02:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as what might be reliable sources in the article aren't actually what they are purported to be or are dead links and links provided above don't appear to be reliable sources. Chrisw80 (talk) 05:10, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.