Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Razzak Johra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. you suggested closing this as WP:SOFTDELETE. That's a process used when there was insufficient discussion to form a real consensus. That's not the case here. However, to address your specific concern, should future events unfold and additional coverage appears such that WP:N is satisfied, this can always be recreated. Thats standard practice. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:43, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Abdul Razzak Johra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notable for single event and event is not notable per WP:NEVENT.  Greenbörg  (talk)  09:39, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  09:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  09:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Anoptimistix  Let's Talk  12:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete just being a journalist who is murdered does not on its own make someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Soft Delete - I agree with the above argument, the fact that journalist was murdered doesn't make it eligible for having stand-alone article. Single events to have an article should receive spectacular coverage like Kanhaiya Kumar. However in future more coverages can make it pass WP:GNG, for that reason I suggest soft-delete, so that WP:REFUND may apply.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.