Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdulaziz bin Abdullah Al-Rubaie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 20:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Abdulaziz bin Abdullah Al-Rubaie

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I do not feel like the subject is notable enough to warrant a wikipedia article. I also see that the article is written just for the purpose for adding a non-notable person to Wikipedia. I vote Delete because this person does not fit the criteria for biographies about journalists. What are his works? What has he done to change the workplace, and what are his achievements. If these are found, then I will instead vote keep. Cheers, AbsoluteSpaceTime (talk) 03:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep. The article is rambling at the moment but the lede does seem sufficient to at least assert notability: "He is one of the main founders of Al-Jazirah newspaper, and he is the first editor-in-chief of Al-Jazirah magazine". I don't speak Arabic so it's hard for me to judge the sources, but if Google Translate is to be trusted it does seem that there are multiple independent sources discussing him per WP:GNG, and seemingly there are entries for him in biographical dictionaries on Google Books. I had to fiddle with Wikidata since the two articles hadn't been linked but there's an Arabic Wikipedia article for him which has more info and mentions that he also worked as a diplomatic representative. Keeping this as "weak" anyway until a native/fluent speaker can judge the sources. —Nizolan (talk · c.) 11:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep per above discussion. I copyedited it. Bearian (talk) 18:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 15:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per above.4meter4 (talk) 16:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.