Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Hamid al Qahtani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. There was a consensus that the sources did not reach the level required to establish notability via WP:GNG. j⚛e deckertalk 16:28, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Abdullah Hamid al Qahtani

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

On a Guantanamo prisoner with no coverage at all. Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:BLP1E. The Citations used are primary sources (Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_84). A list Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay already exists, giving the same info.  D Big X ray  22:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 22:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 22:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 22:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 22:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 22:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  →TSU tp* 10:55, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Given that the sources are primary, the article fails the notability guidelines. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 11:04, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Primary sources, routine case details, does not satisfy WP:GNG. Tarc (talk) 23:41, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. There is lack of WP:RS and fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:BLP1E.  →TSU tp* 15:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.