Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Jibawi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete after being moved to Jibawi, per WP:CSD, by. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Abdullah Jibawi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Self-promotional autobiography by. No notability per WP:ACADEMIC. I suggest a move to his user namespace. bender235 (talk) 15:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete for Sure Wikipedia does not allow people to write a page on themselves, if he is notable a third party editor will create the page.Ryan Vesey (talk) 19:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Mentioned here and here in independent sources. If its a keep it is a very weak one. Although a self-promo which should be nuked, the book he wrote published by Oxford Press and his position in the British Arab Medical Association is notable.... But lack of third party sources about him beyond Oxford and the fact it is a self-promo would lean towards Weak delete.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:03, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, h-index of 3, no important contributions to humanity. Abductive  (reasoning) 14:04, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. While he did author that book, it is not widely held (<30 institutions). This may be due to the fact that the book was published last year and that it may become very influential in the future, but WP:CRYSTAL does not permit us to replace (future) evidence with speculation. Thx, Agricola44 (talk) 15:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.