Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Kadwani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 10:38, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Abdullah Kadwani

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable (or at least non-proven notability), mostly self-referenced, prone to puffery. This reads like an autobio. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 21:43, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - you're right, very puffy, but i think there are sufficient WP:RS to keep this one., and  are English language, and I'm sure there would be more in Urdu. I feel guilty for this !vote, and might start tidying it up! Bigger digger (talk) 01:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Available English sources show notability, and grant a reasonable presumption that non-English sources exist. Concerns with puffery are best addressed through regular editing, and not deletion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:36, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Bigger Digger and MichaelQSchmidt, handle puffery via editing.-- j &#9883; e decker  talk  15:07, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.