Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Sallum Abdullah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  13:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Abdullah Sallum Abdullah

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not Notable Person Aliaboomar (talk) 11:48, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NPOL. Mccapra (talk) 12:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Former state minister of parliamentary affairs - gentleman ran against Bashar Al Assad for presidency of Syria. SNOW keep; SNOW fail to become president. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Why is a search coming back with Abdullah Salluom Abdullah? Perhaps a mispelling? Like with the other AfD, I can't find much on the individual and nothing in-depth. If WP:NPOL allows us to keep subjects that you can't find reliable biographical information on beyond two sentences then maybe there is an issue with the way NPOL is written. I digress, that's another issue for another time. Fails WP:GNG, WP:N, WP:V and pretty much every other guideline surrounding notability but passes WP:NPOL so I guess the subject gets a golden ticket. -- A Rose Wolf  13:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The correct spelling of the name is "عبد الله سلوم عبد الله". What you are seeing are alternative transcriptions into the Roman alphabet for which, as far as I am aware, there is no agreed standard from the Arabic script. I would guess that a transcription done by a French-speaker, quite likely for a Syrian subject, is likely to contain an "o". Phil Bridger (talk) 09:04, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep It should pass for WP:NPOL per Alexandermcnabb assesment. TheChronium  14:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The norms are followed and data is relevant too. A few bugs present, which can be fixed easily.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 14:16, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Satisifies WP:NPOL. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:50, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.