Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Yahia Yousf Al Shabli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:20, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Abdullah Yahia Yousf Al Shabli

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another BLP with serious concerns. The most--and this is really saying something about secondary coverage--I could find on this man was this. It states he was released from Guantanamo along with others, and, to the best of our very limited knowledge of him, was not charged with anything. Some lists mention him briefly, but we are not a database for these guys, especially when coverage barely exists. And, before it is carelessly brought up, this is a collection of PRIMARY documents--nothing which establishes notability. There are several articles like these with similar issues. List of Guantanamo Bay detainees is a possible redirect. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 20:16, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 00:32, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 00:32, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 00:32, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 00:32, 10 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as POVFORK of Guantanamo Bay detention camp. The individual might be notable (not clear per my BEFORE he is - fairly scant coverage (there was some coverage on his release in 2017, I'm not sure I accounted for all possible name variations) - good chance he isn't individually notable) - however the article as presently constituted is not about the individual but about the detention camp. I'm not sure I'd call BLP on gitmo detainees (would depend how we view their POW (or crime) status) - but there's enough other issues that support deletion.Icewhiz (talk) 08:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete a clear case of coatracking that makes the article non-workable in its current form.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:54, 12 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.