Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abed Chaudhury


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  06:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Abed Chaudhury

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

From my searches I don't believe he meets WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. LibStar (talk) 04:23, 4 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 07:06, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 07:08, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 07:09, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 07:11, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Authors.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: The sources cited are either not reliable or have no independent, significant coverage. Furthermore, as a researcher, his total citation count is not that high. No evidence of significant impact as a geneticist. Multi7001 (talk) 03:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: found an independent article from theafricareport.com but I'm not confident this is a reliable source. Opened RfC Jack4576 (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep the reporting on subjects work by The Africa Report amounts to SIGCOV by an independent reliable source. That coupled with the rest of the scattered sources throughout the article is enough for notability IMO Jack4576 (talk) 15:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete If his citation count isn't high enough, it's a no. I can't find much else for additional sourcing to support keeping the article. Oaktree b (talk) 15:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I have searched Google but have not found any sources to meet WP:THREE, WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. Twinkle1990 (talk) 12:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.