Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abellio Greater Anglia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn. original close by the nominator himself was botched, reclosing. I'll reopen this if Mangoe asks me to. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:48, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Abellio Greater Anglia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article concerns an entity which will run a railway service if it is selected by the British Government. I would advise that it would be better to wait and see which company is chosen, and to create a new article then. Cloudbound (talk) 21:04, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 19 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:CRYSTAL. We can wait at least until the contract is awarded, better still until the digging starts or even when the line opens. Mangoe (talk) 02:50, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, this is a franchise to run trains, taking over existing services running on existing railway lines. The company that gets awarded the franchise will run the trains - there are no further ifs. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 06:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Ditto, this is running trains over existing lines, no new digging or anything. It is an operating company.- J.Logan`t : 09:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Greater Anglia. Not much to say about this company at the moment other that its bid for this franchise, but it's still a useful plausible search term. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 06:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * KEEP: IT HAS NOW BEEN AWARDED (20 Oct) so this will be an active company.- J.Logan`t : 09:05, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.