Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhinav Kumar (marketing)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Abhinav Kumar (marketing)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The references appear to me mainly mentions, with a few press releases put in. The individual's jobis in marketing, and WP is not the place for it.  DGG ( talk ) 05:58, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:00, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep This article must not be deleted. DGG states that all the resources in this article are press releases but i don't think so. All the resources used in this article are reliable and on trusted news websites. These are not press releases. Abhinav Kumar is also a notable personality in India. Every Indian family knows him as "Trivaago Guy". He is not only in marketing job. His notability justifies due to his ad film of Trivaago. Divah768 (talk) 06:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Divah768 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
 * Wht do you consider the best reference. Perhaps it is the Business Standard, but reading it, it's a press release, not responsible coverage. And why shouldthere be any better: Kumar's position is to appear in advertisements, and that's what all the references report, mostly in puree notices.  DGG ( talk ) 22:50, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:29, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete While considering this I went from 'delete' to 'keep' and finally back to 'delete'. The better sources cluster around the end of 2017 and focus on his sensation as "Trivago Guy" but there is not, in my opinion enough coverage to pass NACTOR or enduring enough for GNG. He pretty much can be considered in light of WP:BLP1E, which is what brought me back to 'delete'. The later coverage, his board appointment, all looks, as  notes, to be press releases which seek to capitalize on his earlier notability. I have not looked at the foreign language sources so if they show more/better coverage I am willing to reconsider my !vote.  Jbh  Talk  18:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, per JBH and DGG. Vanamonde (Talk) 01:51, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per DGG and JBH.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:52, 18 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.