Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Banerjee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. L Faraone  04:59, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Abhishek Banerjee

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Had both contested WP:PROD and WP:CsD, subject is non notable, he is director of a political party branch which is also non relevant (All India Trinamool Yuva), the article may not grown and get sufficiently beyond stub level and it is not going to provide enough context and background. Eduemoni↑talk↓  13:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  14:26, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  14:27, 6 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep but cleanup to avoid promotionalism. Just clicking on the Gnews link finds coverage, among other things, of his wedding, his political remarks, etc. I think he passes the GNG. Ray  Talk 14:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, as the party he is a member of is significant, is in power in a state, and he has influence in the party organization due to his aunt being the party and state chief. Apart from him heading two cells/branches in the organisation there is comment in the press on his misuse of his political connections. Original article was written by a fan ( or maybe a political aide), even now article keeps getting changed to include only positive comments so some balancing is required. Injun Gone Loco (talk) 11:09, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.