Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Kumar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No sourced information that could be merged.  Sandstein  21:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Abhishek Kumar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable actor per WP:NACTOR, sole reference is the unreliable IMDB, which lists only his supporting role in a film not yet released. I can find nothing else about him online in any WP:Reliable sources. The logs show that this article was speedied six times for notabiity. A person with this name was also bundled into WP:Articles for deletion/Richa Aneja, for which the result was "delete all": not sure if it's the same person. Filing Flunky (talk) 09:27, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Filing Flunky (talk) 09:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON... maybe in a few years if he's successful. Have you noticed the edit warring? An IP keeps pasting in another biography. Odd.  Phnom Pencil  talk contribs 03:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, and the same IPs (e.g. 134.151.33.169) appear in the IP edit warring at Amateur film, boasting about some film club in Bangalore making a wildly successful film starring some famous Bollywood actors, always unreferenced. At Abhay he was listed as an "Indian FBI Commanding Officer". At Bishop Cotton Boys' School and at a few others it says he's a "director and actor in the Bangalore based amateur film industry". Filing Flunky (talk) 09:35, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect to Paanch Ghantey Mien Paanch Crore fails WP:NACTOR and meets WP:BLP1E, as all the sources are related to this movie. --Cavarrone (talk) 06:59, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject's currently short career fails WP:ENT. And while it may be possible to verify his work, he does not have the coverage to meet WP:GNG. On a related note, a new editor claimed on Cavarrone's talk page to be the subject of the article. He's been editing it, so I dropped him a note about WP:COI. Would be okay with the redirect and merge suggested by Cavarrone only so long as the information could be properly sourced.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.