Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abigail Ratchford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 04:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Abigail Ratchford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Beyond the obvious, hollow going on here and the factual inaccuracies (she wasn’t on Parks and Rec). The "Instagram model" does not have a career worthy of a Wikipedia article, least of which that can be verified by reliable sources. And no, she was not covered by the Wall Street Journal. Trillfendi (talk) 14:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:28, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:28, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:28, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:28, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)


 * that the subject was not on Parks and Recreation. The problem with this article is that it has been sourced to, or even (at several points in its history) been straight copies of, the subject's autobiography.  Which is verifiably inaccurate, and not corrected to this day.  This is an example of why we avoid autobiographies.  Uncle G (talk) 02:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * That’s what I’m getting at. The article acts like she had a prominent speaking role on a hit tv show yet the scene never aired. All for the sake of promotion! Frankly any article about an "Instagram model" requires extreme vetting. Trillfendi (talk) 02:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete a lot of inacurate things in this article. Wikipedia seeks accuracy and verrifiability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.