Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abihail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy revert to August version - porn actress version was vandalism. -- RHaworth 02:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Abihail
Article void of content which is about an obscure porn actress. Only recently it was categorized. Mecanismo | Talk 22:07, 11 December 2005 (UTC) Relisting this to generate more discussion. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 19:29, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. DeathThoreau 23:14, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JHMM13 (T | C) 19:46, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * speedy delete per CSD nocontent/nn-bio J\/\/estbrook       22:01, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia should not tolerate or promote obscenity. Bruce176
 * Comment I believe that is not the point. After all, "obscenity" is very subjective. Please vote on encyclopedic merit and precedents --Mecanismo | Talk 23:24, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * comment agreed, just because it is an article about a porn actress, means it still could be encyclopedic, but this specific article is obscure actress, with one line about her, which is not useful in Wikipedia J\/\/estbrook       21:56, 19 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. As it currently exists, there's no real info there. Possibly speedyable, though there's no harm sending it through an AFD. -Colin Kimbrell 22:19, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A1. Stifle 01:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.