Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abiodun Ayodele Ojo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Abiodun Ayodele Ojo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article is an associate professor (not yet a professor) and acting provost (not yet a provost). He fails WP:ACADEMIC. He fails criterion 1 as his research has not made significant impact in his scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. He would have manage to pass criterion 5, had it been he's a full Professor. His appointment as provost (without been a professor) is an indication that a Provost is not a "Distinguished Professor" appointment, therefore fails criterion 5, perhaps the seat is reserved for a professor who will be appointed soon and probably that is why the subject of the article is acting (no reason to be hasty to have a stand-alone article). Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 00:44, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails wp:academic. Oji has the educational experience but sadly that does note equate notability. – 323 MU (talk) 21:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   13:03, 14 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   15:43, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Unfortunately the bar that WP:PROF sets is pretty high for academics and he doesn't meet it. Liz  Read! Talk! 19:43, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

--- the page creator has been indef blocked. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gabnite. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 09:16, 26 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.