Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abiotic (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 17:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Abiotic (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage is WP:ROUTINE and I couldn't find anything that rose above that so fails WP:GNG. No notable musicians, charting, awards, etc. so fails WP:MUSICBIO. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:39, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:39, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:39, 9 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: The most I could find was this article about their album and the two articles in the Wikipedia article from Metal Injection. Comment: The article on Metal Injection should also probably be looked into for notability. A brief search turns up nothing notable, and the article relies almost entirely on primary sources right now.  TheTechnician27  (Talk page)  02:51, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:39, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Two albums on Metal Blade Records satisfies WP:NMUSIC criterion 5, and while (like most metal bands) the majority of coverage is likely to be in print sources, there are multiple examples of significant coverage in reliable sources online:, , , , , and an interview in Guitar World: . --Michig (talk) 09:12, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * When I originally saw it, I didn't think the Guitar World interview would help toward GNG for the band. I'm still not sure it does. I did see the AllMusic review, but did not find the other reviews or articles. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:08, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as passes criterion 1 and 5 of WP:NMUSIC with significant coverage in reliable sources such as AllMusic, Sputnik Music, PopMatters, New Noise Magazine and Houston Free Press and has two albums on a notable label, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:41, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Band is signed to a major label, seems pretty notable. --Seacactus 13 (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.