Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Able2extract


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Able2extract

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NSOFTWARE. Page is almost all promotional, written as an advertisement. Main editor is a WP:SPA who clearly represents the company and is promoting their product. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - sadly. I use this and I LOVE it. 😢😢😢 But I don't think it meets GNG... Is there a notability standard for software/apps? If someone can convince me, I'll reconsider. —Мандичка YO 😜 18:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Promotional and non-encyclopedic. --  Dane talk  20:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.