Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abnormal

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was redirect to abnormality. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 06:08, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

abnormal
This article is about a word, and not about a concept. Wiktionary had had abnormal for 27 months at the time of this article's creation. Given that the only uses of "abnormal" elsewhere are in the ordinary dictionary sense of being the opposite of normal, I don't see much scope for an encyclopaedia article here. Uncle G 15:32, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree. -- Infrogmation 17:29, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * redirect to abnormality. - SimonP 21:34, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Abnormality. Megan1967 23:05, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Keep it's a part of speech whoknew?
 * Above user has nine edits, all to VfD pages. Rhobite 02:41, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.