Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abomination (biblical)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Abomination (Bible). Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I took a break from Wikipedia. My page should not have been deleted but maybe merged or redirected to Abomination (Bible). The Wikipedia pages are two different TALKING POINTS (perspectives). They don't cover the same information either. The objectors who advocated for deletion were being biased, hateful & prejudice and were trying to silence the legitimate interpretation(s) or other argument(s) I gave. They don't know Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek very well. For example, sometimes Latin & Greek words have a first meaning that is different than the words that they are made up. That first meaning is the most common MEANING (usage) & the words that they are made up of are not necessarily applicable. Abomination in Latin means: "Abhorrence [as a bad omen]." It can also be interpreted as: "something (detestable, hateful, loathsome, unclean)." Defining it also as: "vile, wicked, sinful" [Abomination (Bible)] is probably not correct. There are other Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek & Latin words for those WORDS (meanings). An "abhorrence" is usually something that is sinful; but that doesn't mean it is part of its meaning.
 * The Greek word PARAKLETOS "Counselor [as called to one's side]" is another word where its meaning in usage is different than the words it is made up of.
 * Said differently, not every "abhorrence" was a bad omen & not every "counselor" was called to one's side (Job 12:17). BiblicalSch0lar (talk) 18:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Abomination (biblical)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Mess of original research that is just opinion and analysis of primary sources, and not suitable for an article. Of the sources, only the dictionary-type ones are reliable. Most are strange sources like "www.homosexualeunuchsandthebible.com". It's conceivable that this topic is notable, but I'm suggesting we blow it up. Ovinus (talk) 22:57, 27 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Judaism. Ovinus (talk) 22:57, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete we need to remove this overt POV primary-source, original research article ASAP. A controlled detonation per the nom seems to be safest approach. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, we already have this article elsewhere: Abomination (Bible). ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:14, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. POV junk. Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:37, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete this one isn't rescuable. Jahaza (talk) 01:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bible-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with all of the above. Largely original research and the sources provided do not give the significant coverage needed to demonstrate notability. This could plausibly be a notable topic but anyone who did want to create an article would benefit from this one not existing. WJ94 (talk) 08:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the much more coherent Abomination (Bible). Needless duplication. Wag</b><b style="color:#75C">ge</b><b style="color:#83C">r</b><b  style="color:#728">s</b><small  style="color:#080">TALK  14:58, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Although redirects are cheap, I'm not sure I see the purpose of one, as this is a fairly unlikely disambiguation and there's nothing worth preserving. Ovinus (talk) 19:21, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Abomination (Bible). That is a much better article on the same subject. Nothing worth merging, I think.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Redirect to Abomination (Bible) would be an unnecessary task.  Suryabeej      ⋠talk⋡    07:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Abomination (Bible). Looking at the present page, I could not see what the above objections were about. I had to go back and look at the history, because a 40K article by has been reduced to a 4K article by . What remains today includes other ancient translations and is worth merging. – Fayenatic  L ondon 11:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to Abomination (Bible) as an alternative to deletion. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 12:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Abomination (Bible), this seems like a plausible enough search term. Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:20, 7 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.