Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/About a Proof of the Conjecture of Collatz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per WP:CSD (article clearly indicates that it is original research and the name of its creator matches the author of the web page it links to) and WP:SNOW. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:39, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

About a Proof of the Conjecture of Collatz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to be some sort of original research, written up as a wikipedia article. As we're not a maths journal, it should probably be deleted. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC) Tagishsimon (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as original research per WP:OR. There is no indication that this proof has been published anywhere, much less independent sources discussing it. --Mark viking (talk) 23:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above as original research. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. If the proof really does hold together then the article creator should have no difficulty getting it published in a refereed journal, after which we can cover it on Wikipedia. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 07:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - the article as a whole consists entirely of original research and original thought. Even the one reference it references to, appears to be some form of self promotion. — Mythdon 07:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.