Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraash Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 19:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Abraash Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  17:23, 16 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I am quite amazed here that icc worldcup player fails notability? The cricketer is fetured in ICC, Ctv news and various other news sites. so strong Keep. MT KASHTALK Contribs 18:05, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * He hasn't played at ICC Cricket World Cup, only the Under-19 variant. It is consensus on WP:CRIC that this is not sufficiently notable to qualify for an article, it has to be for senior level appearances. Spike &#39;em (talk) 16:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep and expand. Appears to satisfy WP:NCRICK based on the ICC participation, unless I have misunderstood the sources or the guideline. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 18:42, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * - Yes, it appears you have misunderstood WP:NCRICK. It expands to say that a U19 player is not notable, unless they've played in a senior match.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 13:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 11:05, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 11:05, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 11:05, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NCRIC, having not played in a FC, List A or T20 match. U19 matches do not (usually) count.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 10:46, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:NCRIC. Under-19 matches are not FC, List A or T20, and are not of sufficient standing. Johnlp (talk) 12:05, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Also fails WP:NCRIC as noted in two previous votes. Hack (talk) 16:23, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as above, fails WP:CRIN and no evidence that he passes WP:GNG. Spike &#39;em (talk) 16:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above the nominator, the article about an emerging cricketer can't be acceptable with just providing a content on his junior level experience and at least he somehow needs to play in either List A cricket, T20 matches or the First-class cricket matches to get notability. Abishe (talk) 20:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Probably delete for now - this article covers the subject in significant depth and would be the sort of thing I'd look for in terms of meeting the GNG. I can't find very much behind that however to add to the number of sources - the GNG is clear that we need multiple sources. There's this in the Globe and Mail which is a brief profile as is this in the Daily Star and a little in the local Mississauga press but the rest is just run of the mill stuff. It's close to enough to meet the GNG whether or not he's played any senior matches or not. One or two more sources like the first one and it's there for sure - and I will note now that we have far more press coverage of him than we have of many of the "notable" cricketers who might be considered to automatically meet project notability criteria. But not enough for now I'm afraid. Perhaps moving it to user space might be handy - I imagine he'll be considered notable after he's played a single senior match sooner rather than later. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:53, 19 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.