Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Alexander Lindo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep after improvements to this article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Abraham Alexander Lindo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article does not meet GNG or NBIO. Sources are not SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  02:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep His profile by the Centre for the Study of the Legacies of British Slavery constitutes significant coverage, and cites The Lindo Legacy which will have additional coverage. Jfire (talk) 05:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * User:Jfire, the book "Lindo Legacy" was commissioned by a family member. It is therefore not an independent source. Lamona (talk) 02:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:58, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Jamaica. AllyD (talk) 10:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. In no way notable. Athel cb (talk) 12:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jfire. Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: The nominator has been nominated more than 10 articles with same last name. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 10:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I agree with Jfire. CT55555 (talk) 03:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion as most of those advocating Keep do so because of a source mentioned in this discussion. But its independence has been questioned so I'd like to see either a rebuttal of that source so some additional references brought up. And although I have a known dislike for mass nominations of articles, whether or not this article should be Kept should be judged individually based on the merits of this article. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Looks like this book might have coverage. Will check at my local library. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 02:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep- per Jfire, the article has coverage to pass.Epcc12345 (talk) 13:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment Just added info from two different Anglo-Jewish encyclopedias (one old, one recent) on Google Books and he also appears in The Jews in the Caribbean. He also has at least one patent. jengod (talk) 18:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment added title page of the printing of Discourse Delivered on the 6th Tamuz, 5597-9th July, 1837, at the Synagogue of the Spanish and Portuguese Jews, London, on the Occasion of the Demise of His Late Majesty William the Fourth By Abraham Alexandre Lindo 1837 to his infobox. jengod (talk) 18:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.